Vui lòng dùng định danh này để trích dẫn hoặc liên kết đến tài liệu này: http://thuvienso.vanlanguni.edu.vn/handle/Vanlang_TV/20977
Toàn bộ biểu ghi siêu dữ liệu
Trường DCGiá trị Ngôn ngữ
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hye-Ryoung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee-Seung-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-16T00:51:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-16T00:51:51Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2093-7482-
dc.identifier.otherBBKH1766-
dc.identifier.urihttp://thuvienso.vanlanguni.edu.vn/handle/Vanlang_TV/20977-
dc.description7 tr. ; 344kb, Asian Nursing Research 11 (2017) 107e112vi
dc.description.abstract"Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the optimal cutoff values of indices for cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal Korean women. Specifically, we intended to determine the cutoffs of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), serum lipid profile, and homeostatic model of assessmentinsulin resistance (HOMA-IR) for detecting metabolic syndrome (MetS), and metabolic obesity (MO). Methods: The study participants were 397 postmenopausal women. We defined MetS and MO with the International Diabetes Federation criteria except for waist circumference. A receive operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the accuracy of diagnostic indices for identifying MetS and MO. Cutoff values were obtained both from the point on the receive operating characteristic curve which was closest to (0,1) and from the Youden's index. Results: Among the participants, 34.5% and 73% were classified as having MetS and MO. The optimal cutoff of waist circumference and WHR were 81.9 cm [area under curve (AUC): 0.687, sensitivity: 61.7%, specificity: 68.9%], 0.87 (AUC: 0.660, sensitivity: 64.7%, Specificity: 60.2%) for MetS and 77.4 cm (AUC: 0.655, sensitivity: 65.6%, specificity: 57.8%), 0.86 (AUC: 0.680, sensitivity: 67.0%, specificity: 62.7%) for MO. Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein ratio for MetS and MO were 2.11 (AUC: 0.838, sensitivity: 71.5%, specificity: 79.6%) and 1.59 (AUC: 0.725, sensitivity: 65.9%, specificity: 68.2%) respectively. The HOMA-IR for MetS was 1.36 (AUC: 0.773, sensitivity: 73%, specificity: 71.9%) and for MO was 1.17 (AUC: 0.713, sensitivity: 64.5%, specificity: 69.2%). Conclusions: For postmenopausal women, we suggest waist circumference of 81.9 cm and WHR of 0.87 as criteria of MetS. However, women with waist circumference over 77.4 cm and WHR over 0.86 should be monitored for the future development of MetS.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherElsevier Limitedvi
dc.subjectAbdominal obesityvi
dc.subjectMenopausevi
dc.subjectWaist circumferencevi
dc.subjectWaist-to-hip ratiovi
dc.titleOptimal Cutoffs of Cardiometabolic Risk for Postmenopausal Korean Womenvi
dc.typeOthervi
Bộ sưu tập: Bài báo_lưu trữ

Các tập tin trong tài liệu này:
Tập tin Mô tả Kích thước Định dạng  
BBKH1766_Optimal Cutoffs of Cardiometabolic Risk for Postmenopausa.pdf
  Giới hạn truy cập
"Optimal Cutoffs of Cardiometabolic Risk for Postmenopausal Korean Women"343.46 kBAdobe PDFXem/Tải về  Yêu cầu tài liệu


Khi sử dụng các tài liệu trong Thư viện số phải tuân thủ Luật bản quyền.